Nuzzolo, Paolo (2016) Clinical outcomes of socket preservation after tooth extraction using bovine-derived xenograft collagen and collagen membrane or deproteinized bovine bone mineral and collagen membrane compared to blood clot alone. A six-months randomized controlled clinical trial. [Tesi di dottorato]

[img]
Preview
Text
nuzzolo_paolo_28.pdf

Download (61MB) | Preview
[error in script] [error in script]
Item Type: Tesi di dottorato
Lingua: English
Title: Clinical outcomes of socket preservation after tooth extraction using bovine-derived xenograft collagen and collagen membrane or deproteinized bovine bone mineral and collagen membrane compared to blood clot alone. A six-months randomized controlled clinical trial.
Creators:
CreatorsEmail
Nuzzolo, Paolop.nuzzolo@hotmail.it
Date: 25 March 2016
Number of Pages: 65
Institution: Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
Department: Neuroscienze e Scienze Riproduttive ed Odontostomatologiche
Scuola di dottorato: Medicina clinica e sperimentale
Dottorato: Scienze odontostomatologiche
Ciclo di dottorato: 28
Coordinatore del Corso di dottorato:
nomeemail
Rengo, Sandrosanrengo@unina.it
Tutor:
nomeemail
Bucci, PaoloUNSPECIFIED
Date: 25 March 2016
Number of Pages: 65
Uncontrolled Keywords: socket preservation; ridge augmentation; bone loss
Settori scientifico-disciplinari del MIUR: Area 06 - Scienze mediche > MED/28 - Malattie odontostomatologiche
Date Deposited: 11 Apr 2016 22:08
Last Modified: 07 Nov 2016 08:44
URI: http://www.fedoa.unina.it/id/eprint/10729

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical changes of the dimensions of alveolar sockets following application of bovine-derived xenograft collagen and collagen membrane or deproteinized bovine bone mineral and collagen membrane compared with spontaneous healing 6 months after tooth extraction. Fourty-five patients with 45 fresh alveolar sockets were randomly allocated in test group A, test group B or control group. After a 6-months follow-up period surgical re-entry was performed and implants were installed. Statistically significant differences were not recorded in terms of vertical and horizontal bone changes between test and control group, but statistically significant differences were found when sites with self-contained buccal bone changes were compared with fresh alveolar socket with all bony walls. Within the limits of this study, it can be concluded that socket preservation procedures can provide more favorable conditions for the implant placement.

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item