Carbone, Salvatore
(2017)
Institutionalising the dirt trail.
Prompt, participatory and self-built urban upgrading processes in Berlin.
[Tesi di dottorato]
![[img]](http://www.fedoa.unina.it/11633/1.hassmallThumbnailVersion/Carbone_Institutionalising%20the%20dirt%20trail.%20Prompt%20participatory%20and%20self-built%20urban%20upgrading%20processes%20in%20Berlin.pdf)  Preview |
|
Text
Carbone_Institutionalising the dirt trail. Prompt participatory and self-built urban upgrading processes in Berlin.pdf
Download (97MB)
| Preview
|
| Item Type: |
Tesi di dottorato
|
| Resource language: |
English |
| Title: |
Institutionalising the dirt trail.
Prompt, participatory and self-built urban upgrading processes in Berlin. |
| Creators: |
| Creators | Email |
|---|
| Carbone, Salvatore | salvatore.carbone@unina.it |
|
| Date: |
8 April 2017 |
| Number of Pages: |
137 |
| Institution: |
Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II |
| Department: |
Architettura |
| Dottorato: |
Progettazione urbana ed urbanistica |
| Ciclo di dottorato: |
28 |
| Coordinatore del Corso di dottorato: |
| nome | email |
|---|
| Miano, Pasquale | pasmiano@unina.it |
|
| Tutor: |
| nome | email |
|---|
| Moccia, Francesco Domenico | UNSPECIFIED | | Sepe, Marichela | UNSPECIFIED | | Gualini, Enrico | UNSPECIFIED |
|
| Date: |
8 April 2017 |
| Number of Pages: |
137 |
| Keywords: |
temporary uses, self-building, bottom-up urbanism, Berlin, DIY public space, Die Gärtnerei, Prinzessinnengärten, Ber 25, Holzmarkt |
| Settori scientifico-disciplinari del MIUR: |
Area 08 - Ingegneria civile e Architettura > ICAR/14 - Composizione architettonica e urbana
Area 08 - Ingegneria civile e Architettura > ICAR/21 - Urbanistica |
[error in script]
[error in script]
| Date Deposited: |
19 Apr 2017 10:39 |
| Last Modified: |
14 Mar 2018 13:35 |
| URI: |
http://www.fedoa.unina.it/id/eprint/11633 |
| DOI: |
10.6093/UNINA/FEDOA/11633 |
Collection description
This research aims to analyse the complexity of the very delicate moment when the “dirt trial” of temporary uses – with all its related practices – meets the actors of conventional development and economy in a process of institutional reframing. Which are the factors encouraging fruitful collaborations among actors which would be normally lined up poles apart? Is it possible to overpass the impasse which sets the bottom-up against the top-down in favour of a new idea of developing the urban space based on dialogue, mediation and cross-fertilisation?
Downloads per month over past year
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
