Ornella, Salati (2019) Accounting in the Roman Army. Some Remarks on PSI II 119r + ChLA IV 264. In: [non definito].

[img]
Anteprima
Testo
O. Salati_Accounting in the Roman Army.pdf

Download (1MB) | Anteprima
[error in script] [error in script]
Tipologia del documento: Contributo a Convegno o Workshop ([non definito])
Lingua: English
Titolo: Accounting in the Roman Army. Some Remarks on PSI II 119r + ChLA IV 264
Autori:
AutoreEmail
Ornella, Salatiornella.salati@unina.it
Data: Giugno 2019
Numero di pagine: 10
Istituzione: Università degli Studi di Napoli 'Federico II'
Dipartimento: Dipartimento di Studi Umanistici
Nazione dell'editore: Spagna
Luogo di pubblicazione: Barcellona
Editore: Publicacions de l’Abadia de Montserrat
Data: Giugno 2019
Titolo della serie: Scripta Orientalia 3
Intervallo di pagine: pp. 644-653
Numero di pagine: 10
Parole chiave: Roman Army
Settori scientifico-disciplinari del MIUR: Area 10 - Scienze dell'antichità, filologico-letterarie e storico-artistiche > L-ANT/05 - Papirologia
Diritti di accesso: Accesso aperto
Depositato il: 13 Dic 2019 10:19
Ultima modifica: 19 Dic 2019 08:36
URI: http://www.fedoa.unina.it/id/eprint/12351

Abstract

The recent publication of PSI II 119r requires a closer reconsideration of the whole roll. PSI II 119r and Ch.L.A. IV 264 were written by the same hand and feature two different sections of an account book that can be dated with accuracy: in Ch.L.A. IV 264 there is evidence for six units and, in l. 10, the cohors I Lusitanorum is mentioned. This cohort made its first appearance in Egypt in 105 CE at the latest,7 and this date can thus be assumed as a certain terminus post quem. Moreover, in PSI II 119r, fr. a l. 17, the abbreviation of the legio III Cyrenaica can be found. The movements of this legion have been quite widely discussed,but, according to a recent, commonly held, view,8 in 125 CE it was permanently transferred to Arabia. The present paper aims to analyse the evidence in order to describe the exact nature of the document and clarify its purpose. Given their different contents, PSI II 119r and Ch.L.A. IV 264 raise different questions and therefore they will be examined separately. Here attention will be paid only to the salient points. In the final part of the paper, considerations of the evidence as a whole will reassess the theory of the original setting of the roll and will support the alternative explanation of it as a specific military account book.

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

Modifica documento Modifica documento