Piano, Valeria (2019) P.Hercul. 1067 Reconsidered: Latest Results and Prospective Researches. In: UNSPECIFIED.

[img]
Preview
Text
20_Valeria_Piano.pdf

Download (11MB) | Preview
[error in script] [error in script]
Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)
Lingua: English
Title: P.Hercul. 1067 Reconsidered: Latest Results and Prospective Researches
Creators:
CreatorsEmail
Piano, ValeriaUNSPECIFIED
Date: June 2019
Number of Pages: 10
Institution: Università degli Studi di Napoli 'Federico II'
Department: Dipartimento di Studi Umanistici
Nazione dell'editore: Spagna
Place of Publication: Barcellona
Publisher: Publicacions de l’Abadia de Montserrat
Date: June 2019
Series Name: Scripta Orientalia 3
Page Range: pp. 231-240
Number of Pages: 10
Uncontrolled Keywords: Latin Papyri, Herculaneum collection
Settori scientifico-disciplinari del MIUR: Area 10 - Scienze dell'antichità, filologico-letterarie e storico-artistiche > L-ANT/05 - Papirologia
Access rights: Open access
Date Deposited: 13 Dec 2019 10:22
Last Modified: 19 Dec 2019 08:34
URI: http://www.fedoa.unina.it/id/eprint/12356

Abstract

P.Hercul. 1067 is one of the most studied Latin papyri in the Herculaneum collection. A remarkable amount of scholarly inquiry has been devoted to its palaeographical peculiarities (cf. infra). Moreover, in an article published in 19841 Felice Costabile attempted at an overall interpretation of the text and, without producing a proper edition of the papyrus, understood the text as an oratio in Senatu habita ante principem, mostly relying on the textual evidence provided by the Neapolitans ‘disegni’. A new comprehensive study of the papyrus argues against this interpretation and allows to construe the text as a literary work of historical nature, most probably composed by Seneca the Elder. This paper presents some of the results obtained from the thorough re-assessment of P.Hercul. 1067, and will focus on three main aspects: 1. The bibliological features of the roll as they were gathered from its virtual reconstruction. 2. The ‘mise en page’ of the text and the palaeographical features of the script. 3. An evaluation of the work contained in the papyrus in the light of significant new textual evidence.

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item