Lewicki, Kornel Tomasz (2024) Consistency from Quantifiable in Architecture: Spatial Configurations from Economic and Legislative Contingencies. [Tesi di dottorato]
Anteprima |
Testo
Lewicki_Kornel_Tomasz_36.pdf Download (96MB) | Anteprima |
| Tipologia del documento: | Tesi di dottorato |
|---|---|
| Lingua: | English |
| Titolo: | Consistency from Quantifiable in Architecture: Spatial Configurations from Economic and Legislative Contingencies |
| Autori: | Autore Email Lewicki, Kornel Tomasz korneltomasz.lewicki@unina.it |
| Data: | 10 Marzo 2024 |
| Numero di pagine: | 388 |
| Istituzione: | Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II |
| Dipartimento: | Architettura |
| Dottorato: | Architettura |
| Ciclo di dottorato: | 36 |
| Coordinatore del Corso di dottorato: | nome email Mangone, Fabio mangone@unina.it |
| Tutor: | nome email Multari, Giovanni [non definito] (ETH Zurich) Brandlhuber, Arno [non definito] (ULB Bruxelles) Strauven, Iwan [non definito] |
| Data: | 10 Marzo 2024 |
| Numero di pagine: | 388 |
| Parole chiave: | Quantifiable, Economic, Legislative, Project |
| Settori scientifico-disciplinari del MIUR: | Area 08 - Ingegneria civile e Architettura > ICAR/14 - Composizione architettonica e urbana |
| Depositato il: | 18 Mar 2024 13:09 |
| Ultima modifica: | 23 Mar 2026 08:18 |
| URI: | http://www.fedoa.unina.it/id/eprint/15485 |
Abstract
Global heterogeneity and differentiation has progressively made it impossible to agree on a universally valid theory in architecture which could provide shared principles for projects. Moreover in relevant architectural processes it occurs that different powerful figures tend to take crucial decisions way before an architect is invited to sit on the discussion table; this because those discourses are conventionally relegated as not directly influencing the process of a project and treated as given and constraining. If few are the constants and certainties of the process of building up a project and the authority of the discipline is in radical diminishing, architecture has to bind choices with interests of other parties involved and deliver mutual benefits. The research aims at studying built architecture of the current century seeking a consistency of argumentation of choices strictly linked to spatial configuration within parameters of external interest such as economical and legislative. Verifying how and if these quantifiable parameters should be included in the hierarchical system of values for the conception of an architectural project. Portraying how can they generate an objective argument for a complex spatial configuration beyond convention and contribute to building up a consensus of many parties involved in the process. Binding quantifiable parameters in a complex system of relations will result in a consistency of argumentation of a project free of arbitrariness and best satisfying interest. Shifting the paradigm of the process of design from imposition of architectural knowledge to practicing of architectural intelligence and matching spatial intentions with opportunities deducted from such contingencies of mutual interest.
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Actions (login required)
 |
Modifica documento |
