Penta, Antonio
(2008)
MULTIMEDIA KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION AND
MANAGEMENT USING ONTOLOGIES.
[Tesi di dottorato]
(Unpublished)
| Item Type: |
Tesi di dottorato
|
| Resource language: |
English |
| Title: |
MULTIMEDIA KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION AND
MANAGEMENT USING ONTOLOGIES |
| Creators: |
| Creators | Email |
|---|
| Penta, Antonio | a.penta@unina.it |
|
| Date: |
1 December 2008 |
| Number of Pages: |
146 |
| Institution: |
Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II |
| Department: |
Informatica e sistemistica |
| Dottorato: |
Ingegneria informatica ed automatica |
| Ciclo di dottorato: |
21 |
| Coordinatore del Corso di dottorato: |
| nome | email |
|---|
| Cordella, Luigi Pietro | cordel@unina.it |
|
| Tutor: |
| nome | email |
|---|
| Chianese, Angelo | angelo.chianese@unina.it | | Picariello, Antonio | picus@unina.it |
|
| Date: |
1 December 2008 |
| Number of Pages: |
146 |
| Keywords: |
Multimedia Ontology, Multimedia Knowledge Representation and Extractioin, Image Knowledge Extraction, Text Knowledge Extraction |
| Settori scientifico-disciplinari del MIUR: |
Area 09 - Ingegneria industriale e dell'informazione > ING-INF/05 - Sistemi di elaborazione delle informazioni |
[error in script]
[error in script]
| Date Deposited: |
16 Nov 2009 09:39 |
| Last Modified: |
09 Dec 2014 10:36 |
| URI: |
http://www.fedoa.unina.it/id/eprint/3369 |
| DOI: |
10.6092/UNINA/FEDOA/3369 |
Collection description
Despite the great efforts in multimedia processing in both the academic and industrial
contexts, nowadays representing, organizing and managing multimedia data and the related
semantics by means of a formal framework still remains a challenge. In the data
and knowledge engineering community, the formal representation of domain knowledge
is systematically treated by using ontologies. Especially in the semantic web field, many
papers, several models and language have been proposed in order to define the concept
of ontology and to design suitable and efficient systems that really use the ontological
framework for real problems. In the multimedia community, a great emphasis has been
given to the extensional aspects of multimedia ontology: it is easy to find ontologies about
images, videos and audios that contain a number of relevant information about technical
aspects related to multimedia data, its format and a variety of ways used for annotating
complex and rough data. Unfortunately, the same is not true as far as the intensional aspects
of multimedia ontologies are concerned. Indeed, there is still great work to be done
concerning this aspect: starting from the very beginning, it is still not at all clear whether
a multimedia ontology is simply a taxonomy, or a semantic network, what is the role of
concrete data (if any) or whether it is a simple organization of metadata. In addition, the
semantics of multimedia data itself are very hard to define and to capture: for example,
in the image domain, the information carried by an image is inherently both complex and
uncertain. Therefore, its semantics has a fuzzy nature.
To best understand the aims of the present dissertation, let us describe a sample
scenario from common real life situations.
Let us consider a secret service investigation of a large scale anti-terrorristic operation.
In order to carry out the investigation successfully and to avoid dramatic events, the agents
use a large number of electronic devices, to conduct surveillance of places, of people
involved and suspected members of the terroristic organizations.
In particular, they may use the following devices in order to gather data and information:
• The officer may have video cameras to record activities of suspected persons at
various places.
• In addition, the officer may have legally (hopefully) authorized telephone wiretaps,
collecting audio involving conversations that the suspects have participated in.
• The agent may also have a number of photographs taken, containing faces of suspected
people and or a number of illegal activities.
• The officer may have a great number of textual documents, containing a description
of all the previous investigations, judge-court sentences about such people, and so
on.
• Eventually, a relational data base may contain several structured information, i.e.
bank account transactions, credit card and so on.
In all the previous events, it is clear that the core aspect of the investigation is the idea of
multimedia document, containing a variety of formats (textual, pictorial, video, audio) and
a variety of metadata, sometime manually added to the multimedia sources and sometimes
automatically extracted.
Note that in real cases, the number of multimedia data is very huge and the only way to
process such a large number of data is to use automatic tools that can extract information
and represent them in a suitable way. In this framework, it is mandatory to provide a
novel methodology for storing and accessing multimedia data, taking into consideration
both the variety of data sources and the associated uncertainty of automatic analysis and
recognition systems.
3
In this dissertation we will describe a novel formal framework for multimedia ontologies,
and in particular for an image and text data. I propose a framework based on a
constructivist vision of multimedia data processing and representation. In other words,
I provide a suitable knowledge base that can be used for storing and managing different
levels of multimedia data in terms of rough data, intermediate and high level concepts, as
wall as some abstractions that can be observed over them. In this way, I provide a comprehensive
framework that can be used for a variety of purposes: e.g. information storing and
management, information extraction, information retrieval and automatic annotations. In
order to make our theory understandable, we will concentrate in particular on image data
and text data. In other words, I will try to answer the following questions: do we really
need yet another knowledge framework for images? What is a multimedia ontology? Can
this kind of ontology be suitable for representing both intensional and extensional aspects
of multimedia data? What kinds of advantages do we get from image annotation?
Starting from this considerations, I will provide details concerning: i) how I represent
and manage the multimedia information; ii) how I derive high level concepts, considering
the discovered features, objects and elementary concepts.
Downloads per month over past year
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
