Ceesay, Muhammed
(2019)
Collusion in Auctions: Secret vs Public Rings.
[Tesi di dottorato]
Item Type: |
Tesi di dottorato
|
Lingua: |
English |
Title: |
Collusion in Auctions: Secret vs Public Rings |
Creators: |
Creators | Email |
---|
Ceesay, Muhammed | ceesay.muhammad@unina.it |
|
Date: |
11 December 2019 |
Number of Pages: |
101 |
Institution: |
Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II |
Department: |
Scienze Economiche e Statistiche |
Dottorato: |
Economia |
Ciclo di dottorato: |
32 |
Coordinatore del Corso di dottorato: |
nome | email |
---|
Pagano, Marco | marco.pagano@unina.it |
|
Tutor: |
nome | email |
---|
Pagnozzi, Marco | UNSPECIFIED |
|
Date: |
11 December 2019 |
Number of Pages: |
101 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
Collusion, Informational Structures, Auctions, Bidding Rings |
Settori scientifico-disciplinari del MIUR: |
Area 13 - Scienze economiche e statistiche > SECS-P/03 - Scienza delle finanze Area 13 - Scienze economiche e statistiche > SECS-P/06 - Economia applicata |
[error in script]
[error in script]
Additional Information: |
Alternative Email: muhammadcsay@gmail.com |
Date Deposited: |
14 Jan 2020 16:40 |
Last Modified: |
17 Nov 2021 11:45 |
URI: |
http://www.fedoa.unina.it/id/eprint/12983 |

Abstract
This thesis analyzes whether and how an auctioneer who is aware that a ring of colluding bidders is present at the auction should reveal this information to other nonring bidders. We compare auction outcomes in four scenarios: (i) when bidders bid noncooperatively, (ii) when the presence of the ring is unknown to other bidders, (iii) when the ring presence is common knowledge, and (iv) when the ring is secretly known to nonring bidders.
The thesis consists of four chapters.
The first chapter motivates the analysis and lays the argument that conditional on ring
presence, an auctioneer may improve his position depending on how he informs bidders regarding
his suspicion/knowledge that a ring is present at the auction.
The Second and Third chapters are devoted to the formal analysis in private and common
value auctions respectively.
In Chapter 2, we consider single-object first-price and second-price private value auctions
with colluding bidders, and show that with uniformly distributed signals and a ring containing
all-but-one of the bidders, it is best for the auctioneer to announce publicly if he knows that a
ring is present. In this context, the first price auction is preferred to the second price auction.
However, when the ring presence is known secretly to the nonring bidder, then the auctioneer is
better-off under the second price auction.
In Chapter 3 we consider pure common value second price auctions. Assuming the underlying
signals are uniform, we show for a family of valuation functions that publicly announcing the
ring presence is a dominant strategy for the auctioneer, due to the fact that it leads bidders to
bid higher than when bidding purely competitively. This in addition incentivizes an auctioneer
to always announce publicly that a ring is present even if it is not, essentially making bidders
bid higher without using a shill.
In Chapter 4, we present a brief overview of future research. We describe a Bid Coordination
Mechanism a la Marshall and Marx (2007) for the first price auction based on repeated
interactions.
Downloads per month over past year
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |