Arienzo, Alessandro (2008) Security governance between State and market: human security and security sector reform. (Sottomesso)
![[img]](http://www.fedoa.unina.it/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Testo
arienzo-human_security_governance.pdf Visibile a [TBR] Utenti registrati Download (175kB) |
| Tipologia del documento: | Preprint | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Titolo: | Security governance between State and market: human security and security sector reform | ||||
| Autori: |
|
||||
| Data: | Febbraio 2008 | ||||
| Tipo di data: | Sottomissione | ||||
| Data: | Febbraio 2008 | ||||
| Parole chiave: | security, state; governance; development | ||||
| Riferimenti bibliografici: | G. De Búrca and J. Scott, Constitutional Change in the EU: from Uniformità to Flexibility?, Oxford, Hart, 2001; L. Hooghe and G. Marks, Multilevel governance and European Integration, Boulder, Rowman & Littlefield, 2000; L. Hooghe, The European Commission and the Integration of Europe. Images of Governance, Cambridge, CUP, 2001; M. Jachtenfuchs, The governance approach to european integration, “Journal of Common Market Studies”, vol. 39, 2001, pp. 245-264 J.N. Rosenau / E.-O. Czempiel, Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, Cambridge, CUP, 1992 L.S. Finkelstein, What is global governance, «Global Governance», vol. 1, n. 3, 1995, pp. 367-371; J. Pierre and B.G. Peters, Governance, Politics and the State, London, Macmillan Press, 2000; R. O. Keohane, Governance in a Partially Globalized World, «American Political Science Review», vol. 95, 2001, p. 12 e ss; I. Bache and M. Flinders, Multi-level governance in theory and practice, Oxford, O.U.P., 2004 G. Stoker, Governance as a theory: five propositions, “International Social Science Journal”, vol.L, 1998, pp.17-28 R. Mayntz, New challenges to governance theory, European University Institute, Jean Monnet Chair Paper RSC No 98/50, 1998 G. Giraudi, M.S. Righettini, Le autorità amministrative indipendenti. Dalla democrazia della rappresentanza alla democrazia dell’efficienza, Roma-Bari, Laterza, 2002, E.L. Rabin, Federal Regulation in Historical Perspective, “Stanford Law Review”, vol. XXXVIII, pp.1186 ss; M. Gentot, Les autorites administratives indépendent, Paris, PUF, 1991 G. Jaquinot-Delaunay and L. Monnoyer, Le dispositif. Entre usage et concept, “Hermès”, n.25, 1999. G. Deleuze, What is a dispositif? In Michel Foucault Philosopher, edited by Timothy J. Armstrong, New York, Routledge, 1992, pp. 159-168 M. Foucault, The Birth of Biopolitics. Lectures at the College de France, 1978-1979, London, Palgrave, 2008 M. Foucault, Security, Territory, Population. Lectures at the College de France, 1977-1978, London, Palgrave, 2007 Commission on Global Governance, Our Global Neighborhood, Oxford, OUP, 1995 S. Marcenò, Le Tecnologie Politiche dell’Acqua. Governance e Conflitti in Palestina, Milano, Mimesis, 2005 UNDP, Human Development Report – Deepening Democracy in a Fragmented World, New York – Oxford, OUP, 2002 H. Hänggi, Making Sense of Security Sector Governance, p.6, in Challenges of Security Sector Governance, edited by H. Hänggi and T. H. Winkler, DCAF & LIT Verlag, 2003, pp. 3-23 OECD-DAC, The DAC Guidelines: Helping Prevent Violent Conflict, Paris, OECD Publishing, 2001 OECD-DAC, Security System Reform and Governance, Paris, OECD Publishing, 2005 UNDP, Human Development Report, New York, Oxford University Press, 1994 CHS, Human Security Now, New York & London, Grundy & Northledge, 2003 R. Paris, Human Security: Paradigm Shift or Hot Air, “International Security”, vol. 26, n.2, 2001, pp.87-102; G. King and C.J.L. Murray, Rethinking Human Security, ‘Political Science Quarterly’, vol.116, n.4, 2001-2002, pp. 585-610; D. Henk, Human Security: Relevance and Implications, ‘Parameters’, vol. XXV, summer 2005, pp. 91-106 D. Graham (ed.), Migration, Globalisation and Human Security, London, Routledge, 1999 H. Adelman, From Refugees to Forced Migration: the UNHCR and Human Security, ‘International Migration Review’, vol.35, n.1, 2001, pp.7-32 N. Soguk, Refugees and Statecraft, ‘International Politics’, vol. 35, 1998, pp.447-468 J. Torpey, The Invention of the Passport. Surveillance, Citizenship and the State, Cambridge, CUP, 2000 F. Düvell, La Globalizazzione del controllo delle migrazioni, in I confini delle liberta. Per un’analisi politica delle migrazioni contemporanee, edited by S. Mezzadra, Roma, DeriveApprodi, 2004, pp.23-50. F. Düvell, Europäische und internationale Migration. Theorie, Empirie, Geschichte. Münster, Lit, 2006; F. Düvell and B. Jordan Migration: Boundaries of Equality and Justice, Cambridge: Polity, 2003 | ||||
| Settori scientifico-disciplinari del MIUR: | Area 14 - Scienze politiche e sociali > SPS/01 - Filosofia politica Area 14 - Scienze politiche e sociali > SPS/04 - Scienza politica |
||||
| Informazioni aggiuntive: | This document is a pre-print draft. For non registered users: please write to <alessandro.arienzo@unina.it> to ask for a copy of the document. | ||||
| Depositato il: | 14 Lug 2008 | ||||
| Ultima modifica: | 15 Dic 2014 14:00 | ||||
| URI: | http://www.fedoa.unina.it/id/eprint/2788 |
Abstract
The first part of this contribution is dedicated to reconstructing the salient traits of theories of governance that operate on the foundation of reflections on global security. The changes and transformation that have occurred in this category will be analysed in the second part, giving specific attention to the implications that they demonstrate in the international management of movements of populations. My goal is to investigate the relation that is established between governance and State, beginning from the transformations in the codification of the notion of security and from the reflections produced in the field of security governance on the displacement of populations following serious crises or emergencies. In the context of this specific governance, I will attempt to paint a picture of differentiated policies, set to work by – and by means of – multiple actors, including the State whose goal is to bring economic development, security and democratic government into synergy. This nexus is at the centre of reflections on global security governance and constitutes the nucleus of a strategy that aims to support failing (or transitional) States that risk being transformed into ‘rogue States’, thus activating dynamics of war. In the same way, this nexus is at the heart of an ensemble of focused policies that are today posited on the basis of attempts to respond to the immense movements of populations produced by poverty, conflicts, sickness and environmental disasters. In such policies, the State is attributed different roles and functions and, in some cases, competing roles: sometimes it operates as guarantee and principle author of policies of security/safety; at other times it is nothing other than one actor among many that compete in the realisation of definite policies at the international level; more often, it is instead the ‘object’ of more complex strategies of security governance. We thus come to see global security governance as the exercise of a non-statal government over populations. It necessitates the strengthening both of statal institutions and also of autonomous dynamics of the competitive market. Governance thus seems to be able to be functional only in the shadow of the State and market. The first offers it a normative and territorial context of reference, as well as the guarantee of a substantial security community; the second furnishes it with the general form of exchanges.
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Actions (login required)
 |
Modifica documento |
